Keyword summary
0%1 analyzed article/video747 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Iran Us Israel War Oil results contain 25 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias, Availability Heuristic, and Post Hoc (False Cause), with Recency Bias as the most egregious example at 5.8% saturation with 173 hits. Analysis detected 1,411 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,988 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.9% and a BS Rank of 21% (29,926 of 37,536 keywords). This Iran Us Israel War Oil is better (less manipulative) than 79.70% of the peer group.
Iran Us Israel War Oil
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
21%Iran Us Israel War Oil (selected)2%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 2,988
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

20% percentile
025507510020.3% percentile
1.9% BS Score1 analyzed articles3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 0.9%0.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 1.8%1.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 3.8%3.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 1.4%1.4%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 0.7%0.7%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 2.1%2.1%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 1.1%1.1%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 0.6%0.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 4.7%4.7%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 1.0%1.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 5.2%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 6.0%Recency Bias: Keyword 5.8%, sitewide 2.7%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 4.6%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 3.3%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 3.7%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 1.1%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.2%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 1.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 0.8%False Dilemma: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 1.5%Indoctrination: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 0.0%Middle Ground: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 0.1%Appeal to Nature: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 0.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos