Keyword summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 1,509 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Iran U S Talks results contain 23 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias , Negativity Bias , and Appeal to Emotion , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 3.5% saturation with 209 hits . Analysis detected 1,473 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,036 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.1% and a BS Rank of 2% (36,969 of 37,536 keywords). This Iran U S Talks is better (less manipulative) than 98.50% of the peer group. Iran U S Talks
Keyword details
Total words: 6,036
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
2% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 1.5% percentile 1.1% BS Score1 analyzed articles6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 3.5% 3.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 1.8% 1.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 1.7% 1.7% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 0.8% 0.8% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 0.3% 0.3% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 1.6% 1.6% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 1.4% 1.4% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 1.1% 1.1% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 0.6% 0.6% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 1.9% 1.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 11.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.5% Ad Hominem: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 1.9% Hindsight Bias: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 1.4% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 1.1% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 0.8% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst