Keyword summary
0%1 analyzed article/video997 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Iran Threats results contain 35 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Politically Right Leaning Bias, and Appeal to Emotion, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 20.1% saturation with 800 hits. Analysis detected 5,070 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,988 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.6% and a BS Rank of 66% (13,044 of 37,536 keywords). This Iran Threats is worse (more manipulative) than 65.30% of the peer group.
Iran Threats
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
66%Iran Threats (selected)4%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 3,988
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

65% percentile
025507510065.3% percentile
3.6% BS Score1 analyzed articles4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 8.9%8.9%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 20.1%20.1%Politically Right Leaning…Sitewide 1.4%Keyword 12.4%12.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 0.8%0.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 9.6%9.6%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Keyword 5.6%5.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 3.8%3.8%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 1.0%1.0%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 2.0%2.0%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Keyword 0.3%0.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 8.9%, sitewide 26.9%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 20.1%, sitewide 5.3%Negativity Bias: Keyword 16.2%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 9.6%, sitewide 15.9%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Keyword 12.4%, sitewide 1.4%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 8.1%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 5.2%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 6.0%Indoctrination: Keyword 5.6%, sitewide 0.0%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 5.4%, sitewide 4.6%Anecdotal: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 5.2%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 4.0%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 0.5%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 3.1%Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 0.0%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos