Keyword summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 853 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Invasive Mussels results contain 30 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Framing Effect , and Appeal to Emotion , with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 15.4% saturation with 525 hits . Analysis detected 3,932 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,412 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.8% and a BS Rank of 69% (11,804 of 37,533 keywords). This Invasive Mussels is worse (more manipulative) than 68.60% of the peer group. Invasive Mussels
Keyword details
Total words: 3,412
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
69% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 68.6% percentile 3.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 11.3% 11.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 8.3% 8.3% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 2.2% 2.2% Pessimism Bias Sitewide 1.9% Keyword 7.7% 7.7% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Keyword 5.3% 5.3% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 1.9% 1.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 14.6% 14.6% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 15.4% 15.4% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 2.4% 2.4% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 1.1% 1.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 11.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 14.6%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 8.3%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 15.4%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 6.5%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 8.1% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 7.7%, sitewide 1.9% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 5.0%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 6.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 5.4%, sitewide 3.3% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 4.6%, sitewide 5.3% Indoctrination: Keyword 5.3%, sitewide 0.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 4.6% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 2.5% Burden of Proof: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 0.4% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 0.8% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 1.9% Slippery Slope: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 1.7% Begging the Question: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 1.7% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 0.5% False Dilemma: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 1.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst