Keyword summary
ā 0% 1 analyzed article/video 812 analyzed words
BS Summary: These International Institute Of St Louis results contain 29 faulty reasoning types, including In-Group Bias , Negativity Bias , and Appeal to Emotion , with Attempt to Sell a Product or Service as the most egregious example at 9.2% saturation with 300 hits . Analysis detected 2,262 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,248 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.4% and a BS Rank of ā 38% (23,357 of 37,536 keywords). This International Institute Of St Louis is better (less manipulative) than 62.20% of the peer group. International Institute Of St Louis
Keyword details
Total words: 3,248
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
38% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 37.8% percentile 2.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0ā50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 1.1% 1.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 5.8% 5.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 5.5% 5.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 1.2% 1.2% Attempt to Sell a Productā¦ Sitewide 0.5% Keyword 9.2% 9.2% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 1.9% 1.9% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 1.4% 1.4% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Keyword 5.2% 5.2% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 0.4% 0.4% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 2.1% 2.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 5.8%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 5.5%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 11.1% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 9.2%, sitewide 0.5% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 7.2%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 5.2% Indoctrination: Keyword 5.2%, sitewide 0.0% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 4.6% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 2.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 3.3% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 3.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 3.1% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 1.9% Begging the Question: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 1.7% False Dilemma: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 1.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst