Keyword summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These International Emergency Economic Powers Act (ieepa) results contain 24 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Negativity Bias , and Pessimism Bias , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 16.6% saturation with 461 hits . Analysis detected 2,730 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,778 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 37,536 keywords). This International Emergency Economic Powers Act (ieepa) is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group. International Emergency Economic Powers Act (ieepa)
Keyword details
Total words: 2,778
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
0% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.0% percentile 0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Keyword SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 1.0% 1.0% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 12.7% 12.7% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 16.6% 16.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 10.0% 10.0% Pessimism Bias Sitewide 1.9% Keyword 8.6% 8.6% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 5.2% 5.2% Quote-first Misdirection Sitewide 0.0% Keyword 5.7% 5.7% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 4.3% 4.3% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 3.7% 3.7% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 0.9% 0.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 12.7%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 10.0%, sitewide 19.2% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 16.6%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 5.2%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 9.1% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 8.6%, sitewide 1.9% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 5.8%, sitewide 7.5% Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 6.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 5.9%, sitewide 3.3% Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 5.7%, sitewide 0.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 4.6% Recency Bias: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 2.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Slippery Slope: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 1.7% False Dilemma: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 1.5% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 2.0% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 1.1% Sunk Cost Effect: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 0.3% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 0.8% Burden of Proof: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 0.4% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst