Keyword summary
0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These International Emergency Economic Powers Act (ieepa) results contain 24 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Negativity Bias, and Pessimism Bias, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 16.6% saturation with 461 hits. Analysis detected 2,730 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,778 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 37,536 keywords). This International Emergency Economic Powers Act (ieepa) is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
International Emergency Economic Powers Act (ieepa)
Keyword ranking list
Keyword details
Total words: 2,778
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 1.0%1.0%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 12.7%12.7%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 16.6%16.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 10.0%10.0%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Keyword 8.6%8.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 5.2%5.2%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Keyword 5.7%5.7%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 4.3%4.3%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 3.7%3.7%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 0.9%0.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 12.7%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 10.0%, sitewide 19.2%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 16.6%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 5.2%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 9.1%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 8.6%, sitewide 1.9%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 5.8%, sitewide 7.5%Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 6.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 5.9%, sitewide 3.3%Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 5.7%, sitewide 0.0%Anecdotal: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 4.6%Recency Bias: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 2.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%Slippery Slope: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 1.5%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 2.0%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 1.1%Sunk Cost Effect: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 0.3%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 0.8%Burden of Proof: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 0.4%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos