Keyword summary
44% 11 analyzed articles/videos 16,659 analyzed words
BS Summary: These International Affairs results contain 52 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Post Hoc (False Cause) , and Framing Effect , with Confirmation Bias as the most egregious example at 8% saturation with 5,192 hits . Analysis detected 51,112 faulty-reasoning hits from 65,239 analyzed words across 11 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.5% and a BS Rank of 9% (31,916 of 34,832 keywords). This International Affairs is better (less manipulative) than 91.60% of the peer group. International Affairs
Keyword details
Total words: 65,239
Article count: 11
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
8% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 8.4% percentile 1.5% BS Score11 analyzed articles65.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 4.4% 4.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 1.9% 1.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 6.7% 6.7% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 4.4% 4.4% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 0.7% 0.7% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 3.2% 3.2% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 1.3% 1.3% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 3.7% 3.7% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 1.9% 1.9% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 1.6% 1.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 4.4%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 6.7%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 4.4%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 8.0%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 6.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 5.8%, sitewide 3.3% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 4.6% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 0.8% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 3.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst