Keyword summary
0%2 analyzed articles/videos1,358 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Interior Department results contain 36 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Politically Left Leaning Bias, and Framing Effect, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 21.4% saturation with 1,165 hits. Analysis detected 7,776 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,432 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 4% and a BS Rank of 71% (10,705 of 35,985 keywords). This Interior Department is worse (more manipulative) than 70.30% of the peer group.
Interior Department
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
0%Javian Hawkins1%
0%Atlanta Falcons1%
0%Anthony Romano1%
71%Interior Department (selected)4%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 5,432
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

70% percentile
025507510070.3% percentile
4.0% BS Score2 analyzed articles5.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Politically Left Leaning …Sitewide 2.0%Keyword 19.6%19.6%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 21.4%21.4%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 13.8%13.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 1.1%1.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 1.5%1.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 9.7%9.7%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 0.9%0.9%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 1.2%1.2%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 4.2%4.2%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 5.4%5.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 13.8%, sitewide 26.9%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 21.4%, sitewide 5.3%Negativity Bias: Keyword 20.4%, sitewide 19.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 19.6%, sitewide 2.0%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 9.7%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 5.4%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 7.5%Optimism Bias: Keyword 6.9%, sitewide 6.0%In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 6.7%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 3.7%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 2.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 0.8%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 3.1%Recency Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 2.7%Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 0.0%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 1.4%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 1.9%Ad Hominem: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos