Keyword summary
61%1 analyzed article/video626 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Interfaith Dialogue results contain 29 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect, Appeal to Authority, and Appeal to Emotion, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 14.9% saturation with 280 hits. Analysis detected 1,842 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,878 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.4% and a BS Rank of 61% (14,667 of 37,536 keywords). This Interfaith Dialogue is worse (more manipulative) than 60.90% of the peer group.
Interfaith Dialogue
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
61%Interfaith Dialogue (selected)4%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 1,878
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

61% percentile
025507510060.9% percentile
3.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 5.4%5.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 6.3%6.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 1.9%1.9%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 1.5%1.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 14.9%14.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 7.2%7.2%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 4.3%4.3%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Keyword 4.7%4.7%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 3.3%3.3%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 1.9%1.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 5.4%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 14.9%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 6.3%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 7.2%, sitewide 11.1%Halo Effect: Keyword 9.6%, sitewide 6.7%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 6.9%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 6.1%, sitewide 5.3%Optimism Bias: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 5.2%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 1.1%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 4.6%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 3.3%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 4.0%Indoctrination: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 0.0%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 0.5%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 1.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos