Keyword summary
⁠54%1 analyzed article/video2,365 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Intelligence And Security Committee (isc) results contain 35 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias, Framing Effect, and Negativity Bias, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 19.6% saturation with 1,858 hits. Analysis detected 7,450 faulty-reasoning hits from 9,460 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠44% (27,888 of 49,108 keywords). This Intelligence And Security Committee (isc) is better (less manipulative) than 56.80% of the peer group.
Intelligence And Security Committee (isc)
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
⁠0%Property Transfers1%
⁠0%Madison Township1%
⁠0%Buc-Ee's Travel Center1%
⁠0%Buc Ees Travel Center1%
⁠0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
⁠44%Intelligence And Security Committee (isc) (selected)3%
⁠100%Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%Mike Lewis60%
⁠100%Joni Balter60%
⁠100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 9,460
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

43% percentile
025507510043.2% percentile
2.3% BS Score1 analyzed articles9.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 8.3%8.3%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 19.6%19.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 2.0%2.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 8.0%8.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 1.6%1.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 0.5%0.5%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 0.3%0.3%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 0.2%0.2%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 2.0%2.0%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Keyword 0.4%0.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 8.3%, sitewide 26.9%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 19.6%, sitewide 5.3%Negativity Bias: Keyword 8.0%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 11.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 10.7%, sitewide 7.5%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 5.7%, sitewide 8.1%Halo Effect: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 5.2%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 2.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 2.0%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 1.9%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 0.5%Slippery Slope: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 1.7%Begging the Question: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 1.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos