Keyword summary
29% 1 analyzed article/video 484 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Intel 3 Process results contain 17 faulty reasoning types, including Ambiguity (Equivocation) , Overconfidence Bias , and Halo Effect , with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 10.7% saturation with 156 hits . Analysis detected 1,025 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,452 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.2% and a BS Rank of 73% (10,322 of 36,942 keywords). This Intel 3 Process is worse (more manipulative) than 72.10% of the peer group. Intel 3 Process
Keyword details
Total words: 1,452
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
72% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 72.1% percentile 4.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 4.0% 4.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 4.5% 4.5% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Keyword 9.2% 9.2% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 1.1% 1.1% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 2.3% 2.3% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 3.6% 3.6% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 7.0% 7.0% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Keyword 5.4% 5.4% Red Herring Sitewide 0.7% Keyword 2.3% 2.3% Burden of Proof Sitewide 0.4% Keyword 1.6% 1.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 10.7%, sitewide 11.1% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 9.2%, sitewide 0.8% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 7.5% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 7.0%, sitewide 4.6% Halo Effect: Keyword 6.5%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 6.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 5.4%, sitewide 3.7% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 5.3% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 2.7% False Dilemma: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 1.5% Red Herring: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 0.7% Begging the Question: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 1.7% Burden of Proof: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 0.4% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst