Keyword summary
0%1 analyzed article/video896 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Institutional Changes results contain 35 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Hasty Generalization, and In-Group Bias, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 14.3% saturation with 384 hits. Analysis detected 2,751 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,688 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.9% and a BS Rank of 52% (18,335 of 37,536 keywords). This Institutional Changes is worse (more manipulative) than 51.20% of the peer group.
Institutional Changes
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
52%Institutional Changes (selected)3%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 2,688
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

51% percentile
025507510051.2% percentile
2.9% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 5.3%5.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 2.5%2.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 9.5%9.5%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 0.7%0.7%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 14.3%14.3%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 0.5%0.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Keyword 5.4%5.4%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Keyword 0.7%0.7%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 6.0%6.0%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 3.0%3.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 5.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 14.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 9.5%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 11.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 9.1%, sitewide 8.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 6.0%, sitewide 9.1%In-Group Bias: Keyword 7.6%, sitewide 6.9%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 5.8%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 6.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 5.4%, sitewide 0.8%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 5.2%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 5.0%, sitewide 3.3%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 3.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 3.1%False Dilemma: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 1.5%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos