Keyword summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video717 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Indigenous Issues results contain 24 faulty reasoning types, including Post Hoc (False Cause), Appeal to Emotion, and Representativeness Heuristic, with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 6.7% saturation with 193 hits. Analysis detected 1,385 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,868 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2% and a BS Rank of ⁠25% (28,221 of 37,536 keywords). This Indigenous Issues is better (less manipulative) than 75.20% of the peer group.
Indigenous Issues
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
⁠0%Lieutenant Governor1%
⁠0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
⁠0%Texas Supreme Court1%
⁠0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
⁠0%Running Back1%
⁠25%Indigenous Issues (selected)3%
⁠100%Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%Mike Lewis60%
⁠100%Joni Balter60%
⁠100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 2,868
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

25% percentile
025507510024.8% percentile
2.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 1.3%1.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 1.1%1.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 3.2%3.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 2.3%2.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 3.1%3.1%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 2.2%2.2%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 1.7%1.7%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 0.3%0.3%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 1.5%1.5%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 3.1%3.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 6.7%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 5.2%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 4.6%, sitewide 3.3%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 3.7%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 1.9%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.7%Indoctrination: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 0.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 0.8%False Dilemma: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 1.5%Hindsight Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 1.4%Appeal to Nature: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 0.2%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 1.1%Sunk Cost Effect: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 0.3%Actor-Observer Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 0.6%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos