Keyword summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Incogni results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Availability Heuristic, and Overconfidence Bias, with Attempt to Sell a Product or Service as the most egregious example at 43.3% saturation with 990 hits. Analysis detected 4,834 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,289 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 37,327 keywords). This Incogni is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Incogni
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
⁠0%Texas Supreme Court1%
⁠0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
⁠0%Running Back1%
⁠0%Javian Hawkins1%
⁠0%Atlanta Falcons1%
⁠100%Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%Mike Lewis60%
⁠100%Joni Balter60%
⁠100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
⁠0%Incogni (selected)0%
Keyword details
Total words: 2,289
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Keyword 43.3%43.3%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 22.4%22.4%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 13.5%13.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 0.7%0.7%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 18.5%18.5%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Keyword 9.1%9.1%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Keyword 13.7%13.7%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 11.1%11.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Keyword 8.4%8.4%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 1.1%1.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 43.3%, sitewide 0.5%Framing Effect: Keyword 13.5%, sitewide 26.9%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 22.4%, sitewide 8.1%Negativity Bias: Keyword 11.1%, sitewide 19.2%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 18.5%, sitewide 9.1%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 12.9%, sitewide 15.9%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 13.7%, sitewide 4.6%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 11.1%Indoctrination: Keyword 9.1%, sitewide 0.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 8.4%, sitewide 0.8%Optimism Bias: Keyword 8.3%, sitewide 6.0%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 7.5%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 6.9%, sitewide 5.3%In-Group Bias: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 6.7%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 6.2%, sitewide 1.9%Anecdotal: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 5.2%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 3.3%False Dilemma: Keyword 4.4%, sitewide 1.5%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 4.0%Slippery Slope: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 1.7%Loss Aversion: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 2.5%Hindsight Bias: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 1.4%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 2.7%Attempt to Sell a Product or ServiceSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos