Keyword summary
55% 1 analyzed article/video 1,128 analyzed words
BS Summary: These In House AI Models results contain 28 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias , Post Hoc (False Cause) , and Confirmation Bias , with Overconfidence Bias as the most egregious example at 13.2% saturation with 597 hits . Analysis detected 3,971 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,512 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.1% and a BS Rank of 57% (16,359 of 37,536 keywords). This In House AI Models is worse (more manipulative) than 56.40% of the peer group. In House AI Models
Keyword details
Total words: 4,512
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
56% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 56.4% percentile 3.1% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 3.3% 3.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 1.1% 1.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 1.6% 1.6% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 1.0% 1.0% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 13.2% 13.2% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 2.4% 2.4% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Keyword 9.7% 9.7% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 1.1% 1.1% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Keyword 7.8% 7.8% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Keyword 4.9% 4.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 15.9% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 13.2%, sitewide 4.6% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 11.1% Optimism Bias: Keyword 10.0%, sitewide 6.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 9.7%, sitewide 3.3% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 8.2%, sitewide 7.5% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 5.3%, sitewide 8.1% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 7.8%, sitewide 3.7% Halo Effect: Keyword 5.1%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 5.2% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 4.9%, sitewide 0.8% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 4.0% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 1.9% Slippery Slope: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 1.7% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 0.5% Begging the Question: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 1.7% False Dilemma: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 1.5% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 1.1% Appeal to Nature: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 0.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst