Keyword summary
â 0% 2 analyzed articles/videos 1,141 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Illinois General Assembly results contain 40 faulty reasoning types, including Politically Left Leaning Bias , Framing Effect , and Negativity Bias , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 9.7% saturation with 764 hits . Analysis detected 5,554 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,904 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.8% and a BS Rank of â 17% (31,500 of 37,536 keywords). This Illinois General Assembly is better (less manipulative) than 83.90% of the peer group. Illinois General Assembly
Keyword details
Total words: 7,904
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
16% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 16.1% percentile 1.8% BS Score2 analyzed articles7.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0â50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 6.3% 6.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 5.8% 5.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 1.6% 1.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 1.5% 1.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 9.7% 9.7% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 1.1% 1.1% Politically Left Leaning ⌠Sitewide 2.0% Keyword 7.1% 7.1% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 3.3% 3.3% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 1.0% 1.0% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 3.1% 3.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 6.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 5.8%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 9.7%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 8.1% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 7.1%, sitewide 2.0% In-Group Bias: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst