Keyword summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video1,141 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Illinois Clean Jobs Coalition results contain 36 faulty reasoning types, including Politically Left Leaning Bias, Framing Effect, and Negativity Bias, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 12.5% saturation with 571 hits. Analysis detected 3,303 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,564 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2% and a BS Rank of ⁠25% (28,241 of 37,536 keywords). This Illinois Clean Jobs Coalition is better (less manipulative) than 75.20% of the peer group.
Illinois Clean Jobs Coalition
Keyword ranking list
Keyword details
Total words: 4,564
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

25% percentile
025507510024.8% percentile
2.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 7.5%7.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 6.8%6.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 0.4%0.4%Politically Left Leaning …Sitewide 2.0%Keyword 11.9%11.9%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 1.4%1.4%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 0.4%0.4%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 0.8%0.8%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 3.1%3.1%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 0.8%0.8%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 1.1%1.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 7.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 6.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 12.5%, sitewide 15.9%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 11.9%, sitewide 2.0%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 8.1%In-Group Bias: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 4.6%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 3.1%Indoctrination: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 0.0%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.7%Begging the Question: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 1.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 2.2%Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.5%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos