Keyword summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 1,383 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Hunters results contain 42 faulty reasoning types, including Availability Heuristic , Negativity Bias , and Hasty Generalization , with Anecdotal as the most egregious example at 12.8% saturation with 707 hits . Analysis detected 4,509 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,532 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.9% and a BS Rank of 23% (29,170 of 37,536 keywords). This Hunters is better (less manipulative) than 77.70% of the peer group. Hunters
Keyword details
Total words: 5,532
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
22% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 22.3% percentile 1.9% BS Score1 analyzed articles5.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Keyword SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 1.7% 1.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 2.8% 2.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 6.9% 6.9% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 12.8% 12.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 3.9% 3.9% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 0.8% 0.8% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 1.7% 1.7% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 0.6% 0.6% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 1.9% 1.9% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 1.4% 1.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 6.9%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 15.9% Anecdotal: Keyword 12.8%, sitewide 5.2% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 11.2%, sitewide 9.1% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 11.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 6.2%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 5.3% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 3.1% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 1.9% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst