Keyword summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 422 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Hung Cao results contain 25 faulty reasoning types, including Unattributed Quote , Negativity Bias , and Confirmation Bias , with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 19.4% saturation with 328 hits . Analysis detected 1,852 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,688 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.4% and a BS Rank of 75% (9,210 of 36,716 keywords). This Hung Cao is worse (more manipulative) than 74.90% of the peer group. Hung Cao
Keyword details
Total words: 1,688
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
75% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 74.9% percentile 4.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 5.5% 5.5% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Keyword 16.6% 16.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 2.0% 2.0% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 19.4% 19.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 11.9% 11.9% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 1.4% 1.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 6.2% 6.2% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 4.7% 4.7% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 2.0% 2.0% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 1.9% 1.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 5.5%, sitewide 26.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 19.4%, sitewide 6.7% Negativity Bias: Keyword 11.9%, sitewide 19.2% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 16.6%, sitewide 1.1% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 6.2%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 6.6%, sitewide 7.5% Optimism Bias: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 5.2% Recency Bias: Keyword 5.1%, sitewide 2.7% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 4.6% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 2.7% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 1.9% Middle Ground: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 0.1% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 0.8% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 1.9% Composition/Division: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 0.2% False Dilemma: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 1.5% Horn Effect: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 1.0% Burden of Proof: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 0.4% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst