Keyword summary
58% 1 analyzed article/video 617 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Humanitarian Supplies results contain 18 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Appeal to Emotion , and In-Group Bias , with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 9.2% saturation with 170 hits . Analysis detected 1,045 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,851 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.1% and a BS Rank of 57% (16,425 of 37,536 keywords). This Humanitarian Supplies is worse (more manipulative) than 56.20% of the peer group. Humanitarian Supplies
Keyword details
Total words: 1,851
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
56% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 56.2% percentile 3.1% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 2.8% 2.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 7.9% 7.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 7.0% 7.0% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 1.0% 1.0% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 2.5% 2.5% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 2.2% 2.2% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 0.7% 0.7% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 5.9% 5.9% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 1.9% 1.9% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Keyword 0.7% 0.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 7.9%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 7.0%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 5.9%, sitewide 11.1% Halo Effect: Keyword 9.2%, sitewide 6.7% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 6.8%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 5.2% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 3.1% Bandwagon: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 2.2% Composition/Division: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 0.2% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 1.4% Sunk Cost Effect: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 0.3% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 0.8% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst