Keyword summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 795 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Human Interest results contain 27 faulty reasoning types, including Anecdotal , Halo Effect , and Post Hoc (False Cause) , with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 7.1% saturation with 225 hits . Analysis detected 1,584 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,180 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.8% and a BS Rank of 19% (28,939 of 35,697 keywords). This Human Interest is better (less manipulative) than 81.10% of the peer group. Human Interest
Keyword details
Total words: 3,180
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
19% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 18.9% percentile 1.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 1.8% 1.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 2.8% 2.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 1.9% 1.9% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 2.6% 2.6% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 1.1% 1.1% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 0.2% 0.2% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 7.1% 7.1% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 3.7% 3.7% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 3.0% 3.0% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Keyword 0.8% 0.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 7.1%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 4.6%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 4.6% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.7% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 1.1% Bandwagon: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.2% Red Herring: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 0.7% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 1.9% False Dilemma: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 1.5% Primacy Effect: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 0.9% Hindsight Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 1.4% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 0.8% Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 0.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst