Keyword summary
30%2 analyzed articles/videos781 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Hugh Hewitt results contain 34 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect, Negativity Bias, and Framing Effect, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 10.3% saturation with 1,005 hits. Analysis detected 6,670 faulty-reasoning hits from 9,794 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2% and a BS Rank of 25% (26,943 of 35,700 keywords). This Hugh Hewitt is better (less manipulative) than 75.50% of the peer group.
Hugh Hewitt
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
0%Javian Hawkins1%
0%Atlanta Falcons1%
0%Anthony Romano1%
25%Hugh Hewitt (selected)3%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 9,794
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

25% percentile
025507510024.5% percentile
2.0% BS Score2 analyzed articles9.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 4.7%4.7%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 6.4%6.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 4.4%4.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 0.8%0.8%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 0.4%0.4%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 1.3%1.3%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 3.5%3.5%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 3.1%3.1%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 0.9%0.9%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 2.0%2.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 6.4%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 4.4%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 10.3%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 8.1%Halo Effect: Keyword 8.0%, sitewide 6.7%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.2%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 0.5%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 1.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate