Keyword summary
0%1 analyzed article/video1,624 analyzed words
BS Summary: These How We Rise results contain 34 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Politically Left Leaning Bias, and Hasty Generalization, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 7.5% saturation with 485 hits. Analysis detected 4,220 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,496 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.9% and a BS Rank of 22% (29,613 of 37,536 keywords). This How We Rise is better (less manipulative) than 78.90% of the peer group.
How We Rise
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
22%How We Rise (selected)2%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 6,496
Article count: 1
Authors
?

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

21% percentile
025507510021.1% percentile
1.9% BS Score1 analyzed articles6.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 6.9%6.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 1.3%1.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 0.3%0.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 7.5%7.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 3.8%3.8%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 0.1%0.1%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 0.8%0.8%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 0.3%0.3%Politically Left Leaning …Sitewide 2.0%Keyword 6.7%6.7%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 1.7%1.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 6.9%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 7.5%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 6.7%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 6.7%, sitewide 2.0%Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 3.7%Indoctrination: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 0.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.2%False Dilemma: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 1.5%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 1.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos