Keyword summary
⁠26%1 analyzed article/video925 analyzed words
BS Summary: These How To Train Your Dragon results contain 29 faulty reasoning types, including False Dilemma, Hasty Generalization, and Optimism Bias, with Post Hoc (False Cause) as the most egregious example at 8.9% saturation with 329 hits. Analysis detected 2,324 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,700 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠31% (26,244 of 37,536 keywords). This How To Train Your Dragon is better (less manipulative) than 69.90% of the peer group.
How To Train Your Dragon
Keyword ranking list
Keyword details
Total words: 3,700
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

30% percentile
025507510030.1% percentile
2.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 2.6%2.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 0.5%0.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 4.7%4.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 1.7%1.7%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 2.7%2.7%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 1.5%1.5%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Keyword 8.9%8.9%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 1.3%1.3%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Keyword 6.2%6.2%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 1.1%1.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 9.1%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 8.9%, sitewide 3.3%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 5.2%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 6.7%False Dilemma: Keyword 6.2%, sitewide 1.5%Optimism Bias: Keyword 5.2%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 4.0%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 1.9%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 2.5%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 1.7%Begging the Question: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 1.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 0.8%Hindsight Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 1.4%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos