Keyword summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Houston Why results contain 23 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Biased Writer Voice, and Hasty Generalization, with Politically Left Leaning Bias as the most egregious example at 33.2% saturation with 383 hits. Analysis detected 1,873 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,154 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 37,536 keywords). This Houston Why is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Houston Why
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
⁠0%Lieutenant Governor1%
⁠0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
⁠0%Texas Supreme Court1%
⁠0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
⁠0%Running Back1%
⁠100%Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%Mike Lewis60%
⁠100%Joni Balter60%
⁠100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
⁠0%Houston Why (selected)0%
Keyword details
Total words: 1,154
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Politically Left Leaning …Sitewide 2.0%Keyword 33.2%33.2%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 1.7%1.7%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 17.0%17.0%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Keyword 12.5%12.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 24.4%24.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 10.9%10.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 2.9%2.9%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 15.3%15.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 2.5%2.5%Personal IncredulitySitewide 0.2%Keyword 6.4%6.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 33.2%, sitewide 2.0%Framing Effect: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 24.4%, sitewide 15.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 10.9%, sitewide 19.2%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 17.0%, sitewide 5.3%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 15.3%, sitewide 8.1%Ad Hominem: Keyword 12.5%, sitewide 2.2%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 5.6%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 5.4%, sitewide 6.7%Personal Incredulity: Keyword 6.4%, sitewide 0.2%Indoctrination: Keyword 6.0%, sitewide 0.0%Horn Effect: Keyword 5.2%, sitewide 1.0%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 4.6%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 2.7%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 1.9%Straw Man: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 0.9%False Dilemma: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 1.5%Hindsight Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 1.4%Politically Left Leaning BiasSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos