Keyword summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Houston Culture results contain 40 faulty reasoning types, including In-Group Bias , Representativeness Heuristic , and Appeal to Authority , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 9.9% saturation with 724 hits . Analysis detected 5,341 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,323 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 37,536 keywords). This Houston Culture is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group. Houston Culture
Keyword details
Total words: 7,323
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
0% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.0% percentile 0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles7.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 3.3% 3.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 4.5% 4.5% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 1.3% 1.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 9.9% 9.9% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 5.2% 5.2% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 3.3% 3.3% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 1.0% 1.0% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 2.6% 2.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 5.1% 5.1% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 0.8% 0.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 9.9%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 5.2%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 5.1%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 5.8%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 6.0% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 5.6%, sitewide 1.9% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 3.3% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 3.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst