Keyword summary
5% 2 analyzed articles/videos 713 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Houston Cougars results contain 27 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect , Confirmation Bias , and Optimism Bias , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 3.9% saturation with 154 hits . Analysis detected 1,258 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,918 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.2% and a BS Rank of 3% (36,619 of 37,536 keywords). This Houston Cougars is better (less manipulative) than 97.60% of the peer group. Houston Cougars
Keyword details
Total words: 3,918
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
2% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 2.4% percentile 1.2% BS Score2 analyzed articles3.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 0.4% 0.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 1.2% 1.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 1.0% 1.0% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 1.3% 1.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 0.5% 0.5% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 2.0% 2.0% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 0.5% 0.5% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 0.5% 0.5% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 3.6% 3.6% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Keyword 0.6% 0.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 3.3% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.7% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 0.5% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 1.9% Begging the Question: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 1.7% False Dilemma: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 1.5% Hindsight Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 1.4% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 1.1% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst