Keyword summary
45% 1 analyzed article/video 545 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Houston Area Lawmakers results contain 20 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization , Appeal to Authority , and Availability Heuristic , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 17.1% saturation with 373 hits . Analysis detected 1,261 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,180 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.9% and a BS Rank of 62% (21,480 of 56,410 keywords). This Houston Area Lawmakers is worse (more manipulative) than 61.90% of the peer group. Houston Area Lawmakers
Keyword details
Total words: 2,180
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
62% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 61.9% percentile 2.9% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 0.7% 0.7% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 3.2% 3.2% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 4.6% 4.6% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 1.8% 1.8% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 1.6% 1.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 4.2% 4.2% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 1.0% 1.0% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 2.3% 2.3% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 5.2% 5.2% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Keyword 2.1% 2.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 17.1%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 4.6%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 5.2%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 5.3% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 3.3% Loss Aversion: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 2.5% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.7% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 1.9% False Dilemma: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 1.5% Indoctrination: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 0.0% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 1.1% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst