Keyword summary
0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These House Of Miles East St Louis results contain 28 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Halo Effect, and Indoctrination, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 4.8% saturation with 249 hits. Analysis detected 2,358 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,152 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 35,771 keywords). This House Of Miles East St Louis is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
House Of Miles East St Louis
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
0%Javian Hawkins1%
0%Atlanta Falcons1%
0%Anthony Romano1%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
0%House Of Miles East St Louis (selected)0%
Keyword details
Total words: 5,152
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles5.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 0.6%0.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 2.4%2.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 1.6%1.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 2.1%2.1%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 1.6%1.6%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 0.9%0.9%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 1.9%1.9%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 0.7%0.7%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 4.6%4.6%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Keyword 3.4%3.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 4.6%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 4.4%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 3.7%Indoctrination: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 0.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.7%Hindsight Bias: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 1.4%False Dilemma: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 1.5%Bandwagon: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 0.8%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 1.7%Begging the Question: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 1.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos