Keyword summary
45% 1 analyzed article/video 2,720 analyzed words
BS Summary: These House Homeland Security results contain 34 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority , Biased Writer Voice , and Framing Effect , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 17.3% saturation with 1,412 hits . Analysis detected 6,108 faulty-reasoning hits from 8,160 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.2% and a BS Rank of 32% (25,768 of 37,536 keywords). This House Homeland Security is better (less manipulative) than 68.60% of the peer group. House Homeland Security
Keyword details
Total words: 8,160
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
31% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 31.4% percentile 2.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles8.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 4.9% 4.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 3.9% 3.9% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 1.9% 1.9% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 0.2% 0.2% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 1.7% 1.7% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 2.3% 2.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 5.8% 5.8% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 1.0% 1.0% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 0.4% 0.4% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Keyword 4.3% 4.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 4.9%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 17.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 5.8%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 5.0%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 4.6% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 3.3% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 1.1% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 3.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 2.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 0.8% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.0% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 1.9% Slippery Slope: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 1.7% Begging the Question: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 1.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst