Keyword summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 500 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Hope Clinic For Women results contain 24 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Status Quo Bias , and Post Hoc (False Cause) , with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 6.5% saturation with 129 hits . Analysis detected 1,008 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,000 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.1% and a BS Rank of 28% (27,058 of 37,536 keywords). This Hope Clinic For Women is better (less manipulative) than 72.10% of the peer group. Hope Clinic For Women
Keyword details
Total words: 2,000
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
28% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 27.9% percentile 2.1% BS Score1 analyzed articles2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 2.0% 2.0% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 0.9% 0.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 5.0% 5.0% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 2.5% 2.5% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 1.6% 1.6% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 1.9% 1.9% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 1.6% 1.6% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 2.8% 2.8% Status Quo Bias Sitewide 2.2% Keyword 4.6% 4.6% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias Sitewide 3.1% Keyword 1.1% 1.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 5.0%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 8.1% Optimism Bias: Keyword 6.5%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 5.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 4.6%, sitewide 2.2% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 3.3% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 3.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 2.7% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 2.0% Ad Hominem: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 2.2% Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 0.0% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 1.9% Slippery Slope: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 1.7% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 1.1% Burden of Proof: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 0.4% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 0.8% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst