Keyword summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 1,282 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Hong Grace Peng results contain 19 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Unattributed Quote , and Framing Effect , with Confirmation Bias as the most egregious example at 11.3% saturation with 582 hits . Analysis detected 3,081 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,128 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.2% and a BS Rank of 57% (16,133 of 37,420 keywords). This Hong Grace Peng is worse (more manipulative) than 56.90% of the peer group. Hong Grace Peng
Keyword details
Total words: 5,128
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
57% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 56.9% percentile 3.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles5.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 6.3% 6.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 0.4% 0.4% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Keyword 10.4% 10.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 2.1% 2.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 11.0% 11.0% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 1.8% 1.8% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 0.7% 0.7% Quote-first Misdirection Sitewide 0.0% Keyword 3.8% 3.8% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 11.3% 11.3% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Keyword 0.3% 0.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 6.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 11.0%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 15.9% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 11.3%, sitewide 7.5% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 11.1% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 10.4%, sitewide 1.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 9.1% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 5.2% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 4.0% Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 0.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 3.3% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.5% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 0.8% False Dilemma: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 1.5% Horn Effect: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 1.0% Sunk Cost Effect: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 0.3% Burden of Proof: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 0.4% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst