Keyword summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 1,111 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Honeycrisp results contain 34 faulty reasoning types, including Anecdotal , Post Hoc (False Cause) , and Negativity Bias , with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 7.8% saturation with 346 hits . Analysis detected 2,980 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,444 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2% and a BS Rank of 24% (28,747 of 37,536 keywords). This Honeycrisp is better (less manipulative) than 76.60% of the peer group. Honeycrisp
Keyword details
Total words: 4,444
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
23% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 23.4% percentile 2.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 1.5% 1.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 4.4% 4.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 4.3% 4.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 1.9% 1.9% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 4.1% 4.1% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 1.2% 1.2% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 1.7% 1.7% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 2.9% 2.9% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 2.0% 2.0% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Keyword 0.6% 0.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 4.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 7.8%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 5.1%, sitewide 5.2% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 3.3% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 4.6% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 3.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.7% False Dilemma: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 1.5% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.5% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 2.2% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 0.8% Horn Effect: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 1.0% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst