Keyword summary
0%2 analyzed articles/videos880 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Home Invasion results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Out-Group Homogeneity Bias, Appeal to Emotion, and Hasty Generalization, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 20.5% saturation with 623 hits. Analysis detected 4,210 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,044 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.5% and a BS Rank of 76% (9,068 of 37,536 keywords). This Home Invasion is worse (more manipulative) than 75.80% of the peer group.
Home Invasion
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
76%Home Invasion (selected)5%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 3,044
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

76% percentile
025507510075.8% percentile
4.5% BS Score1 analyzed articles3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 2.6%2.6%Out-Group Homogeneity BiasSitewide 3.1%Keyword 16.3%16.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 2.6%2.6%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 1.5%1.5%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 10.8%10.8%Politically Right Leaning…Sitewide 1.4%Keyword 6.7%6.7%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 11.8%11.8%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 3.5%3.5%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Keyword 0.7%0.7%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Keyword 2.9%2.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 20.5%, sitewide 19.2%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 16.3%, sitewide 3.1%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 16.3%, sitewide 15.9%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 11.8%, sitewide 8.1%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 11.1%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 10.8%, sitewide 5.3%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 10.5%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 6.9%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Keyword 6.7%, sitewide 1.4%Anecdotal: Keyword 4.9%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 3.3%Indoctrination: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 0.0%Recency Bias: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 2.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 2.7%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 1.9%Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 0.0%Bandwagon: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 2.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate