Keyword summary
26%1 analyzed article/video1,078 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Hmong Man results contain 29 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Optimism Bias, and Framing Effect, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 10% saturation with 433 hits. Analysis detected 2,796 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,312 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.2% and a BS Rank of 33% (25,311 of 37,536 keywords). This Hmong Man is better (less manipulative) than 67.40% of the peer group.
Hmong Man
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
33%Hmong Man (selected)3%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 4,312
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

33% percentile
025507510032.6% percentile
2.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 5.0%5.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 0.8%0.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 10.0%10.0%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 0.9%0.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 9.9%9.9%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 3.1%3.1%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 3.3%3.3%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 1.7%1.7%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 1.9%1.9%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Keyword 2.3%2.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 5.0%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 10.0%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 9.9%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 7.5%Optimism Bias: Keyword 5.7%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 2.7%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 1.9%Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.2%Begging the Question: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 1.5%Hindsight Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 1.4%Sunk Cost Effect: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 0.3%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 0.8%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos