Keyword summary
0%1 analyzed article/video1,475 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Hippie Hill results contain 26 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Unattributed Quote, and Optimism Bias, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 6.2% saturation with 364 hits. Analysis detected 2,748 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,900 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.8% and a BS Rank of 17% (28,658 of 34,426 keywords). This Hippie Hill is better (less manipulative) than 83.20% of the peer group.
Hippie Hill
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
0%Javian Hawkins1%
0%Atlanta Falcons1%
0%Anthony Romano1%
17%Hippie Hill (selected)2%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 5,900
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

17% percentile
025507510016.8% percentile
1.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles5.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 5.6%5.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 2.5%2.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 0.8%0.8%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 0.3%0.3%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 0.2%0.2%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 1.7%1.7%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 0.8%0.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 3.0%3.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 6.2%6.2%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Keyword 0.4%0.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 5.6%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 6.2%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 5.2%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 5.2%, sitewide 1.1%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 4.6%Indoctrination: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 0.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 3.3%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 1.5%Primacy Effect: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 0.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 0.8%Appeal to Nature: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 0.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos