Keyword summary
0%1 analyzed article/video594 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Hind Rajab results contain 25 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Politically Left Leaning Bias, and Framing Effect, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 18.2% saturation with 325 hits. Analysis detected 1,957 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,782 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.4% and a BS Rank of 76% (9,328 of 37,536 keywords). This Hind Rajab is worse (more manipulative) than 75.20% of the peer group.
Hind Rajab
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
76%Hind Rajab (selected)5%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 1,782
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

75% percentile
025507510075.2% percentile
4.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 8.6%8.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 7.7%7.7%Politically Left Leaning …Sitewide 2.0%Keyword 9.3%9.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 2.8%2.8%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 1.6%1.6%BandwagonSitewide 2.2%Keyword 6.9%6.9%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 3.6%3.6%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 3.8%3.8%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Keyword 3.0%3.0%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Keyword 0.8%0.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 8.6%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 7.7%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 18.2%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 9.9%, sitewide 11.1%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 9.3%, sitewide 2.0%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 6.2%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 7.5%Bandwagon: Keyword 6.9%, sitewide 2.2%In-Group Bias: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 5.0%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 3.1%Indoctrination: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 0.0%Straw Man: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 0.9%Begging the Question: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 1.7%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 0.5%Ad Hominem: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 2.2%False Dilemma: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 1.5%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 1.4%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos