Keyword summary
76% 1 analyzed article/video 1,383 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Hillel International results contain 35 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Framing Effect , and Appeal to Emotion , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 30.3% saturation with 1,258 hits . Analysis detected 5,056 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,149 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.5% and a BS Rank of 63% (13,979 of 37,536 keywords). This Hillel International is worse (more manipulative) than 62.80% of the peer group. Hillel International
Keyword details
Total words: 4,149
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
63% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 62.8% percentile 3.5% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 22.9% 22.9% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 13.0% 13.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 30.3% 30.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 6.6% 6.6% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 4.2% 4.2% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 3.4% 3.4% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 3.4% 3.4% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 0.3% 0.3% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 1.7% 1.7% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Keyword 0.8% 0.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Negativity Bias: Keyword 30.3%, sitewide 19.2% Framing Effect: Keyword 13.0%, sitewide 26.9% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 22.9%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 6.6%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 5.4%, sitewide 7.5% Anecdotal: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 5.2% Ad Hominem: Keyword 5.1%, sitewide 2.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 3.3% Recency Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.7% Circular Reasoning: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 0.1% Red Herring: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 0.7% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 2.0% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 1.9% False Dilemma: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 1.5% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 1.1% Straw Man: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 0.9% Burden of Proof: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 0.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst