Keyword summary
0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Hilary Benn results contain 27 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Biased Writer Voice, and Appeal to Emotion, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 17.5% saturation with 482 hits. Analysis detected 2,833 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,752 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 37,536 keywords). This Hilary Benn is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Hilary Benn
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
0%Hilary Benn (selected)0%
Keyword details
Total words: 2,752
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 17.5%17.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 1.8%1.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 10.9%10.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 7.7%7.7%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 1.0%1.0%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 1.2%1.2%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 3.5%3.5%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 9.0%9.0%Representativeness Heuris…Sitewide 1.9%Keyword 4.9%4.9%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 5.7%5.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 17.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 10.9%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 7.7%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 6.9%, sitewide 9.1%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 9.0%, sitewide 5.3%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 5.7%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 6.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 5.5%, sitewide 3.3%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 4.9%, sitewide 1.9%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 4.6%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 4.6%, sitewide 3.1%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 2.0%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 4.0%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 2.2%Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 0.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 0.8%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 1.4%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos