Keyword summary
â 0% 1 analyzed article/video 809 analyzed words
BS Summary: These High Oil Price results contain 20 faulty reasoning types, including Overconfidence Bias , Hasty Generalization , and Negativity Bias , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 17.5% saturation with 425 hits . Analysis detected 2,210 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,427 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.6% and a BS Rank of â 77% (8,808 of 37,536 keywords). This High Oil Price is worse (more manipulative) than 76.50% of the peer group. High Oil Price
Keyword details
Total words: 2,427
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
77% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 76.5% percentile 4.6% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0â50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 17.2% 17.2% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 0.6% 0.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 6.3% 6.3% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 17.5% 17.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 9.9% 9.9% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 0.7% 0.7% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 1.6% 1.6% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 1.6% 1.6% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Keyword 7.7% 7.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias Sitewide 3.1% Keyword 0.2% 0.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 17.5%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 9.9%, sitewide 19.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 17.2%, sitewide 4.6% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 6.3%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 11.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 10.2%, sitewide 8.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 9.1% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 7.7%, sitewide 3.7% In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 5.3% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 2.5% Ad Hominem: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 1.1% Straw Man: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 0.9% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 0.8% Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 0.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst