Keyword summary
80% 1 analyzed article/video 455 analyzed words
BS Summary: These High Frequency Trading Firms results contain 21 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Appeal to Emotion , and Post Hoc (False Cause) , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 14.9% saturation with 272 hits . Analysis detected 1,723 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,820 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.5% and a BS Rank of 83% (9,254 of 53,799 keywords). This High Frequency Trading Firms is worse (more manipulative) than 82.80% of the peer group. High Frequency Trading Firms
Keyword details
Total words: 1,820
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
83% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 82.8% percentile 4.5% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 13.7% 13.7% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 2.3% 2.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 4.4% 4.4% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Keyword 9.0% 9.0% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 1.4% 1.4% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 0.9% 0.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 14.9% 14.9% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 4.1% 4.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 12.3% 12.3% False Dilemma Sitewide 1.5% Keyword 4.6% 4.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 13.7%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 14.9%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 12.3%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 4.4%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 9.1% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 9.0%, sitewide 3.3% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 7.5% Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 5.2% False Dilemma: Keyword 4.6%, sitewide 1.5% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 4.0% Begging the Question: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 1.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 2.5% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 1.1% Special Pleading: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 0.3% Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 0.0% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 0.5% Burden of Proof: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 0.4% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst