Keyword summary
39% 1 analyzed article/video 1,245 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Helen results contain 37 faulty reasoning types, including Ambiguity (Equivocation) , Appeal to Authority , and Availability Heuristic , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 7.3% saturation with 271 hits . Analysis detected 2,173 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,735 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.6% and a BS Rank of 11% (33,648 of 37,536 keywords). This Helen is better (less manipulative) than 89.60% of the peer group. Helen
Keyword details
Total words: 3,735
Article count: 1
Authors
?
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
10% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 10.4% percentile 1.6% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 1.1% 1.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 1.9% 1.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 7.3% 7.3% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 1.4% 1.4% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 1.3% 1.3% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 0.9% 0.9% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Keyword 6.6% 6.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 3.5% 3.5% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 1.6% 1.6% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 6.5% 6.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 7.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 6.5%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 6.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 6.6%, sitewide 0.8% Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 2.0% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 1.9% Hindsight Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 1.4% False Dilemma: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 1.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst