Keyword summary
78% 1 analyzed article/video 654 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Heel Prick Test results contain 26 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias , Framing Effect , and In-Group Bias , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 29.2% saturation with 764 hits . Analysis detected 2,897 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,616 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.3% and a BS Rank of 74% (9,918 of 37,536 keywords). This Heel Prick Test is worse (more manipulative) than 73.60% of the peer group. Heel Prick Test
Keyword details
Total words: 2,616
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
74% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 73.6% percentile 4.3% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 1.7% 1.7% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 21.4% 21.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 29.2% 29.2% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 14.4% 14.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 3.1% 3.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 1.6% 1.6% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 2.7% 2.7% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 0.5% 0.5% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 1.2% 1.2% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 2.7% 2.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 29.2%, sitewide 15.9% Framing Effect: Keyword 14.4%, sitewide 26.9% Optimism Bias: Keyword 21.4%, sitewide 6.0% Negativity Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 5.9%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 5.2% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 3.3% Begging the Question: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 1.7% Sunk Cost Effect: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 0.3% Recency Bias: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 1.9% False Dilemma: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 1.5% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 0.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst