Keyword summary
21% 4 analyzed articles/videos 1,438 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Heartstopper Forever results contain 38 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Halo Effect , and Appeal to Emotion , with Attempt to Sell a Product or Service as the most egregious example at 12.9% saturation with 1,759 hits . Analysis detected 10,042 faulty-reasoning hits from 13,668 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.9% and a BS Rank of 22% (27,872 of 35,675 keywords). This Heartstopper Forever is better (less manipulative) than 78.10% of the peer group. Heartstopper Forever
Keyword details
Total words: 13,668
Article count: 4
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
22% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 21.9% percentile 1.9% BS Score4 analyzed articles13.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 3.5% 3.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 4.4% 4.4% Attempt to Sell a Product… Sitewide 0.5% Keyword 12.9% 12.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 5.6% 5.6% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 2.3% 2.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 1.6% 1.6% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 11.6% 11.6% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 1.6% 1.6% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 1.2% 1.2% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 2.6% 2.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 4.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 5.6%, sitewide 15.9% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 12.9%, sitewide 0.5% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 11.6%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 11.1% Halo Effect: Keyword 9.7%, sitewide 6.7% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 3.3% Recency Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Indoctrination: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 0.0% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.0% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst