Keyword summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 945 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Heartfelt Songs results contain 26 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Appeal to Emotion , and Framing Effect , with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 20.3% saturation with 769 hits . Analysis detected 3,158 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,780 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.2% and a BS Rank of 58% (15,802 of 37,536 keywords). This Heartfelt Songs is worse (more manipulative) than 57.90% of the peer group. Heartfelt Songs
Keyword details
Total words: 3,780
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
58% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 57.9% percentile 3.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 6.6% 6.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 1.0% 1.0% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 20.3% 20.3% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 14.3% 14.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 2.3% 2.3% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 0.6% 0.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 1.9% 1.9% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 0.7% 0.7% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 1.6% 1.6% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 0.5% 0.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 6.6%, sitewide 26.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 20.3%, sitewide 6.7% Negativity Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 14.0%, sitewide 15.9% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 14.3%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 4.6% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 3.7% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 1.9% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 3.3% Recency Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 1.9% Actor-Observer Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 0.6% Primacy Effect: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 0.9% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 0.8% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst