Keyword summary
19% 1 analyzed article/video 1,194 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Heart Program results contain 20 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias , Appeal to Emotion , and Appeal to Authority , with Anecdotal as the most egregious example at 8.2% saturation with 390 hits . Analysis detected 1,924 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,776 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2% and a BS Rank of 38% (34,586 of 55,424 keywords). This Heart Program is better (less manipulative) than 62.40% of the peer group. Heart Program
Keyword details
Total words: 4,776
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
38% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 37.6% percentile 2.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Keyword SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 0.6% 0.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 2.9% 2.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 3.6% 3.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 0.7% 0.7% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 3.3% 3.3% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 1.2% 1.2% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 2.7% 2.7% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 2.5% 2.5% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 8.2% 8.2% Recency Bias Sitewide 2.7% Keyword 0.3% 0.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 9.1% Anecdotal: Keyword 8.2%, sitewide 5.2% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 5.6%, sitewide 6.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 3.3% Recency Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.7% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 1.9% False Dilemma: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 1.5% Circular Reasoning: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 0.1% Sunk Cost Effect: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 0.3% Composition/Division: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 0.2% Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 0.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst