Keyword summary
0%3 analyzed articles/videos1,293 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Hazardous Materials results contain 35 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Availability Heuristic, and Appeal to Authority, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 12.4% saturation with 1,467 hits. Analysis detected 7,451 faulty-reasoning hits from 11,791 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.8% and a BS Rank of 18% (30,977 of 37,536 keywords). This Hazardous Materials is better (less manipulative) than 82.50% of the peer group.
Hazardous Materials
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
18%Hazardous Materials (selected)2%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 11,791
Article count: 3
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

18% percentile
025507510017.5% percentile
1.8% BS Score3 analyzed articles11.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 3.7%3.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 6.1%6.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 12.4%12.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 4.3%4.3%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 2.0%2.0%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 1.0%1.0%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 1.7%1.7%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 1.0%1.0%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Keyword 0.5%0.5%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 1.9%1.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 12.4%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 6.1%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 5.8%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.5%Indoctrination: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 0.0%Bandwagon: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate