Keyword summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 407 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Haskell Indian Nations results contain 26 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias , Framing Effect , and Hasty Generalization , with Attempt to Sell a Product or Service as the most egregious example at 15% saturation with 245 hits . Analysis detected 1,651 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,628 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.9% and a BS Rank of 70% (11,507 of 37,536 keywords). This Haskell Indian Nations is worse (more manipulative) than 69.30% of the peer group. Haskell Indian Nations
Keyword details
Total words: 1,628
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
69% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 69.3% percentile 3.9% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 11.0% 11.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 4.2% 4.2% Attempt to Sell a Product… Sitewide 0.5% Keyword 15.1% 15.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 4.5% 4.5% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 14.4% 14.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 4.7% 4.7% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 2.7% 2.7% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 0.7% 0.7% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 3.6% 3.6% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 3.3% 3.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 11.0%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 15.9% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 15.1%, sitewide 0.5% Optimism Bias: Keyword 14.4%, sitewide 6.0% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 6.5%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 4.0% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 0.8% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 3.3% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 1.9% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 3.1% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 1.1% Circular Reasoning: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 0.1% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 1.9% Personal Incredulity: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 0.2% False Dilemma: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 1.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst