Keyword summary
95% 1 analyzed article/video 1,131 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Harvard College results contain 36 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization , Negativity Bias , and Appeal to Authority , with Confirmation Bias as the most egregious example at 31.4% saturation with 1,064 hits . Analysis detected 5,236 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,393 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.3% and a BS Rank of 74% (9,816 of 37,536 keywords). This Harvard College is worse (more manipulative) than 73.90% of the peer group. Harvard College
Keyword details
Total words: 3,393
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
74% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 73.9% percentile 4.3% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 31.4% 31.4% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 3.6% 3.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 1.2% 1.2% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 17.0% 17.0% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 2.8% 2.8% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Keyword 6.2% 6.2% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 0.7% 0.7% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Keyword 6.5% 6.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 14.1% 14.1% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 1.5% 1.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 31.4%, sitewide 7.5% Framing Effect: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 14.1%, sitewide 19.2% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 17.0%, sitewide 8.1% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 9.8%, sitewide 11.1% Anecdotal: Keyword 9.3%, sitewide 5.2% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 9.1% Halo Effect: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 6.7% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 6.5%, sitewide 1.1% Indoctrination: Keyword 6.2%, sitewide 0.0% Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 6.0% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Keyword 5.4%, sitewide 1.4% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 4.4%, sitewide 5.3% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 5.3%, sitewide 4.6% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 3.1% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 4.0% Begging the Question: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 1.7% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 3.3% False Dilemma: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 1.5% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 2.7% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Confirmation Bias Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst