Keyword summary
37% 2 analyzed articles/videos 1,024 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Harrisburg results contain 32 faulty reasoning types, including Attempt to Sell a Product or Service , Optimism Bias , and Halo Effect , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 7.5% saturation with 883 hits . Analysis detected 5,626 faulty-reasoning hits from 11,804 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.5% and a BS Rank of 8% (34,527 of 37,536 keywords). This Harrisburg is better (less manipulative) than 92.00% of the peer group. Harrisburg
Keyword details
Total words: 11,804
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
8% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 8.0% percentile 1.5% BS Score2 analyzed articles11.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 2.3% 2.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 1.3% 1.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 2.5% 2.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 1.6% 1.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 0.7% 0.7% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 1.0% 1.0% Attempt to Sell a Product… Sitewide 0.5% Keyword 7.0% 7.0% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 0.8% 0.8% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 1.6% 1.6% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 0.9% 0.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 7.5% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 7.5%, sitewide 5.3% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 7.0%, sitewide 0.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 5.6%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 5.9%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 5.2% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 3.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 1.9% Begging the Question: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 1.7% False Dilemma: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 1.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst